MR - I think it was Andrew Voss wh mentioned a recent rule change in the NRL. Likewise I remember a number of players under 18 playing in the first team. Surely Theo is the most recent example at Salford?
QuoteRed Preacher="Red Preacher"Iain - thanks. I'll have a look.
MR - I think it was Andrew Voss wh mentioned a recent rule change in the NRL. Likewise I remember a number of players under 18 playing in the first team. Surely Theo is the most recent example at Salford?
AI - Indeed.'"
Any australian rule change wont show up in the document Iain posted. That is the current version of the RFL operational rules, and is only applicable to clubs registered to the RFL.
The Australians are a little less good at publishing their rules (or rather Im not as good at finding them) - www.abc.net.au/4corners/document ... l_2012.pdf is the latest version I could (quickly) find and is the NRL equivilent to what Iain posted. Any new rules wont be in there though.
There are quite a few examples of players playing before the age of 18, Scott Moore I believe still holds the record for being the youngest.
QuoteRed Preacher="Red Preacher"Iain - thanks. I'll have a look.
MR - I think it was Andrew Voss wh mentioned a recent rule change in the NRL. Likewise I remember a number of players under 18 playing in the first team. Surely Theo is the most recent example at Salford?
AI - Indeed.'"
Any australian rule change wont show up in the document Iain posted. That is the current version of the RFL operational rules, and is only applicable to clubs registered to the RFL.
The Australians are a little less good at publishing their rules (or rather Im not as good at finding them) - www.abc.net.au/4corners/document ... l_2012.pdf is the latest version I could (quickly) find and is the NRL equivilent to what Iain posted. Any new rules wont be in there though.
There are quite a few examples of players playing before the age of 18, Scott Moore I believe still holds the record for being the youngest.
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.
