After watching our first two games of the season could anyone pick out what our gameplan was for either game?

We obviously seem to be playing the flat attack to instruction. Why, I have no idea. However all players know the benefits of running onto the ball and standing deep in attack so to not do those things suggests that the coach has them doing it for a reason or our players are just ignoring him.

Despite this we made some good ground at Hudders, (much less at home to Saints). Then when we get into the opposition 20m area we seem to run out of ideas. We have one set move where Halley gets the ball and runs towards the touchline ineffectually. This move was used last season too to little effect. Other set moves escape me and there is little support play.

The kicking game suffers when we don't make ground forward. Versus Saints we were getting nowhere and turning the ball over on their 40m line at times. When we got into their quarter we decided bomb Wellens. Why? He's solid under the bomb yet they had Meli on the wing who's quite dodgy and young Lomax on the other. Was this another example of us playing to instruction or making it up as we went along?

Either we're playing to an awful gameplan or the team are totally ignoring McNamara's instructions. Either way I'm at a loss!

Well we're clearly still using the tactics that were in effect back when we had Vainikolo on one wing and Vaikona on the other, the first two tackles in every single one of our sets are wasted by pointless dummy half runs from our wingers.
The next two tackles are used up by drives from props - clearly still using tactics from years ago when we had Fielden, Anderson and Vagana.

After watching yesterday's match it's quite clear we have no tactics in place for the last tackle!

Don't forget the amount of times we were caught in possession on the last tackle, and what happened to all these brilliant grubbers Orford was doing at Hull KR? I can't remember 1 grubber kick into the in goal area from Orford yesterday.

I know that sometimes it pays to settle down and stick the ball up the jumper but surely the best way is to do it running onto the ball at speed? Our forwards are too small to do this from a standing start. Also I do think that two scoots by the wingers when we're on halfway is a waste of an attacking opportunity, especially when they tend to run across field.

Obviously the gameplan was to put bombs up to Wellens yesterday. Either that or we ignored the game plan.

Based on the last 2 games, we either have no tactics, or the completely wrong ones.

As you point out either it's poor, or the players are ignoring the coach. Either way the coach is at fault.

Seemed to me Kearney was trying to kick diagonally across field for the other centre/wing meaning we turned the ball over on the 40 a couple of times. Orford's grubber kicks close to the line seemed to stem from desperation and as Cullen pointed out on B n'all we have no one cutting back to run lines against the grain of Orford's direction, meaning a sliding defense copes every time. Most are taking the ball at a standing start and when close to the line we continuously drift one way - right to left - then fail and then drift the other way and try again, with no dummy running and as you identify one set move with Halley on the run around, it's extremely predictable. There seems to be some emphasis upon Beaver as a play maker getting his hands free to put Kearney though the gap, the same technique that was used and didn't work with Jefferies last year. Other than that there seems to be little clue and even if we do run from deep there's no evidence of switching the direction of attack, or an understanding between players in terms of inside passes, offloading or support etc. All of which Saints demonstrated in abundance.

We don't have the power to play one out and suck a defense in, so there is little space created and without good lines and lots of support/dummy running you'll always struggle against a well drilled defense. Add to that an inability to control the ruck and a real struggle to compete defensively against a big set of forwards and you'll get hammered just like yesterday.

I think it is quite clear what our tactics are, give it Lanlgey, Lynch, Scruton, etc to drive it in every time and see if you can bull doze their way over the try line.

If that fails, we resort to giving it to orford to give it Kearney who will run diagonally and seemingly get no where fast.

When that doesnt work, plan c is to fire a 30 metre pass out to the wing which will either be intercepted or will completely off target and go to ground.

It is often said that Orford is the best number 7 to never represent his country, I'm sorry but from the form he has showed so far , I wouldn't let him represent our conuntry, never mind the Kangeroos!

I think we need to leave Orford alone at the moment

Lets get the facts straight:

- He is pivotal to any gameplan and therefore will need time for him to settle in & others to settle around him. Not sure a friendly at HKR, Giants away and yesterdays farce have given him much opportunity yet

- He is playing in a new comp and needs to adjust to Northern Hempisphere RL

- He had no pre season with us & then arrived to 6 inches of white stuff he has probably never seen before

- According to Brad Drew on Radio Leeds last night he had a knee op in winter and will still be recovering. Now I know on these threads we have lots of experts but i tend to listen to someone with his experience

- Many, many good judges in Oz gave him tag of best half back never to play for Oz. Now again , I would tend to listen to this opinion from people in the know who have watched him perform in best comp in world for approx 10 years, rather than the many experts who visit Odsal and then seem quick to slag people off

- He is also playing in a side probably, no certainly, without the calibre of players he is used to and who not what he wanted them to do and would it as they knew he would go with correct option

Lets give him a fair crack and really IMO the same applies to Kearney. Lots of people now appear to want him to play at FB, so what do we do then, wait another length of time to give a new pairing at half back chance to gel!

I agree abut laying off Orford , but letting Orford run the show isn't a game plan. Or maybe it is and for the reasons you indicate above that's why we have problems. However, how would you account for the lack of a game plan in previous seasons?

Orford looked liked he was in a state of shock yesterday, as if it was just dawning on him that his teammates weren't up to it. Hence some of the rash passes.

When did he have a knee op and how bad was the problem? I was quite surprised that a player supposedly on very good money, the new playmaker of the team didnt turn up until quite late into pre season and didnt feature that much. If he was recovering from an op and was unable to travel then fair enough, but there did seem to be a marked contrast with the approach of Glen Morrison who arrived in Bradford well before pre season training started.

Do you mean Hall?